Or, people (understandably) want solid evidence that the vaccine is safe for young kids, but when they finally get enough testing done to proclaim it safe for a particular span of young kids, people want to stretch the age group limits AND be assured that it's safe for them to do. People want them to hurry up and approve the vaccine, then other people say the approval was rushed and so they're suspicious and won't take the vaccine. But I do think "the authorities" are sort of "damned if they do and damned if they don't" here.
I know what you mean, in terms of weighing actual risks for this 4.9-year-old child. kid has an 80% chance of being infected with COVID, is it really riskier to vaccinate them early than to get the actual virus? My suspicion is that it's safer to have the vaccine, but if something does go wrong then it becomes the authorities' fault, while the more likely scenario of an adverse reaction to the coronavirus itself is God's fault, not theirs.
Our multi-step vaccination procedure includes several safety checks to minimize the chance of human error and we have reviewed this process with our pharmacy staff in order to prevent such occurrences.I wonder about advice like that. "In the event of any error, our first concern is always our patients’ well-being. ".Generally speaking, such instances are rare, and Walgreens takes these matters very seriously," the statement continued. In a statement to NBC 5, a Walgreens spokesperson said patient safety is its top priority and privacy laws prohibit the company from "commenting on specific patient events." What led up to the mix-up still remains unclear. "We want them to be held accountable for making not one but four mistakes that could put our kids lives at risk, and we want to make sure this doesn't happen again," Alexandra said.Īs of Friday, a lawsuit hadn't been filed against the company. Their son, she explained, was experiencing tachycardia, where one's heart rate exceeds 100 beats per minute.įor now, the parents are focused on their kids' health and making sure Walgreens is held responsible for what happened. “ said our daughter was having higher blood pressure than she would like,” Alexandra said. Tuley, the family attorney, said both children began showing signs of heart issues and were taken to a pediatric cardiologist. Here's Why the Moderna and J&J Booster Shot Debate is Different From Pfizer The pharmaceutical company is seeking approval for children ages 5 to 11, but if approved, children in the age bracket would be given one-third of the adult dose. At 4 and 5 years old, both children are well below 12 years old, the minimum age required to receive the Pfizer vaccine. The children were issued vaccination cards, the family's attorney, Daniel Tuley explained, because doses of the vaccine had been administered. “And I’m like well what did we get? And he was like we got the COVID-19 shot, And instantly I was like, well what does this mean for my kids.?”
“Walgreens called me to say there was a mix up, we did not receive the flu shot,” Alexandra said in an interview with WFIE, the NBC affiliate in Evansville.
Flu shot booster shot 5 year full#
But later, a Walgreens employee called and said they made a mistake.īoth kids had been given full adult doses of the Pfizer vaccine, the family learned. The family left the pharmacy, thinking all was well and that the kids were given flu shots.
Flu shot booster shot 5 year android#
Download our local news and weather app for iOS or Android - and choose the alerts you want.
0 kommentar(er)
